I've had a number of requests for copies of my
Peace Grand Challenge competition entry, so I've copied it below. The competition was "to submit an essay describing your idea on the subject ‘Innovative solutions for world peace, 2014-2034.’" It was evaluated on these criteria:
- Impact (25%) – Ability to impact millions of people
- Technology (25%) – Smart use of technology
- Feasibility (25%) – Project feasibility (including sociological credibility)
- Applicant (25%) – Applicant profile, achievements, and potential
(Which should explain why I write a bit about myself)
The essay was written by adding more detail to a
blog entry that I wrote last year:
A Self-improving, Transparent, Democratic,
Meritocratic, International System
About Me
I
have been writing software since I was eleven years old. When I was
seventeen, I wrote a real time 3D graphics engine with texture
mapping, in assembly language (only something that hardcore computer
nerds do). Since then I have accumulated sixteen years of
professional programming experience. It should come as no surprise,
therefore, that my idea is based on software.
The Problem
In
order to create world peace, one has to solve the problem of world
conflict. These are some reasons for conflict:
People
are divided into groups like religions and countries. Without being
classified into a group it's more difficult to find a group to
fight.
People
have extreme ideas and are unwilling to be critical of their ideas
and consider alternate points of view.
Desperation,
caused by poverty. If one had everything one wanted there would be
no reason to fight.
Lack
of a systematic method to change what you care about, leading to
ineffective petitions, striking, demonstrating, rioting and civil
war.
Lack
of transparency in governments, leading to corruption, lack of trust
and anarchy.
Perhaps
you can think of more reasons, but I'll leave that up to you to think
about as you read my idea and ponder whether or not this idea (or any
other idea) addresses the causes of conflict.
According
to Wikipedia
the countries of the world are governed as follows:
Type
of regime
|
%
of countries
|
%
of world population
|
Full
democracies
|
15
|
11.3
|
Flawed
democracies
|
32.3
|
37.2
|
Hybrid
regimes
|
22.2
|
14.4
|
Authoritarian
regimes
|
30.5
|
37.1
|
One
might think that the solution to world conflict is to get that 15% up
to 100%. but while democracy sounds like a great idea, and generally
is much better than a dictatorship, it has many flaws including:
 |
| The current archaic voting system. |
Being
based on archaic voting systems.
Only
applies within a country.
The
problem that the majority actually know far less about what they're
voting for than the minority of experts.
Highly
inefficient, when you think about the £31,000,000
that parties spend campaigning for an election.
Votes
are not only cast by the extremely rare intellectual few who know
the ins and outs of every party, but by a large group of people who
are influenced by advertising.
I
could carry on, but I'm sure you get the general idea.
A Potential Solution
“You
never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To
change something, build a new model that makes the existing model
obsolete.”
― R.
Buckminster Fuller
 |
| My StackOverflow profile. |
What
annoys me is that we have really great democratic, meritocratic and
transparent systems in the IT world, like StackExchange,
but the way governments run countries seems to be a bit prehistoric.
I don't know much about politics, but I know a good system when
I see one.
Let
me start by telling you a bit about StackExchange and why it is
awesome:
On StackOverflow,
their sub-site for asking programming questions, one can ask a
programming question, and, if it is a well written question, based on
their guidelines, one usually has the correct answer within minutes.
Amazingly, this is a free service. I'm not quite sure if
that explains just how incredible the system is, so let me try
another way: One can either spend hours or days trying to solve
a complex programming problem, or type it into StackOverflow and have
it answered in minutes!
So,
how does the system work?
Everyone
can earn points by asking questions, answering questions, doing
reviews, improving formatting, etc. One earns these points
democratically, meaning that one earns points by other people looking
at what one has done and awarding or deducting points. Once one
reaches a certain number of points, one is considered more
trustworthy or knowledgeable and therefore more functions are enabled
for that person. The details are quite complex, but the system
has obviously been shaped over many years into what it is today, a
beautiful and elegant solution.
Imagine
what a self-improving and transparent democratic, meritocratic system
could be like...
It
starts with a well defined end goal, perhaps along the lines of
"Increase the level of human happiness throughout the world,"
in order to focus the users and help the system to evolve with a
purpose.
Ideally
the system would be universal, however, realistically it would
require the ability to make changes in specific geographical areas
where there may be a different need, or more users, or perhaps the
system is used by a political party.
Perhaps
you, as a user of the system, came up with the idea that it might be
good for everyone to get benefits instead of just people who are not
working, so you go to the website and type your proposal, "Give
benefits to everyone, not just those who are unemployed."
The
website gives you a list of similar suggestions, and noticing that
your proposal is already on the system and is number 273 in the
queue, with 834 votes, you click the vote button to increase the
value of the proposal and write a comment explaining why it would
mean so much to you.
|
|
Screen
for suggesting a proposal in hypothetical democratic,
meritocratic system.
|
The
proposal now has 835 votes and with its new value it is bumped up to
position 272 in the queue. Within the next few weeks a further
7433 people vote for the proposal and it eventually reaches the
number one place in the queue. Your comment on the proposal has
been noted by many people and voted up so that it is number five in
the list of comments.
People
who have earned the most points on the system vote for a group of
experts on the subjects involved, including mathematicians and people
who are highly clued up about benefits. This group of experts
each records a ten minute video explaining anything that they think
is relevant, and then the videos are uploaded to the site and linked
to the question. The people with the most points (trusted)
watch all the videos and then vote on whether or not to go ahead with
the proposal. Each vote includes a the voter's reason for
voting for their choice.
70%
of the voters decide that it is not a good idea to give everyone
benefits, so the proposal is disapproved, but you are not happy. You
believe that the system is faulty and you should be one of the people
with a large number of points, so you can be included in the final
round of voting. For this reason you need to increase your
points to 200. This takes a lot of work.
You
do a logic test, which bumps up your points from 50 to 100. Then
you read all of the recommended books... some history, some critical
thinking, some science, some psychology, etc. One of them
doesn't appeal to you, so you create a proposal that the book is
changed. Eventually you do all the tests on the books that you
read and your points are bumped up to 150. Unfortunately you
don't quite get the points that you need, so you decide to try to
become an expert on benefits.
You
go to the expert section on the website and follow the strategy to
become an expert. Eventually you write an amazing article on
benefits and are selected as an expert. The next time the
benefits proposal makes its way to the top of the list you are ready
with your well researched video on how amazing the world would be if
everyone had benefits.
Your
video is watched by the people with the most points and 80% of them
vote for everyone to have benefits and the new policy becomes
reality.
Unfortunately
the new policy doesn't work out as well has you'd hoped, but since
there is a democratic way to change things, people propose an even
better system and the better system is implemented next.
Of
course this is a rough idea of a transparent, self-improving,
democratic, meritocratic system. You can probably find faults
in this solution... yip, I can see some already, but this is just the
start. The real system should be thoroughly discussed and
thought out and would become more complex as it matures and improves.
The main point, however, of this system, is that it is
self-improving and focused. What better way to find a
solution than a system that improves itself and generates solutions?
The
system could be used not only for international change, but also
for smaller groups, like charities or researchers, trying to figure
out the most efficient way to solve a problem.
But
imagine if it was used internationally. Imagine if you could see a
clear and well defined path that you could take to suggest any
change, or become an expert on any matter so that your knowledge,
experience and desire for change could make a difference.
Practical
Aspects
How
to build it
Building
the system is the easy bit. A basic, working system, ready to be
improved as the system starts working, could be built in a month by a
good programmer.
How
to make it grow
The
system would require regular use by a group of people in order for
its' usefulness to be seen and to attract users and grow. For this
reason it could start as simply a way for a charity similar to
GiveWell to decide the most
effective way to spend donations. Perhaps it could be used by
activist communities like Zero
State and Humanity+
to collaborate internationally. It could be used to run a public
company, although that could work against peace, if the goal is to
make money, seeing as the most effective ways to make money are not
necessarily the most moral.
As
the system matures, the charity or activist community could, for
example, use the system to figure out better ways to find users. It
might want to have donations, and it might want to use some kind of
international currency like bitcoins, or it might simply rely on
volunteers to complete any tasks that come out of the system.
Imagine
an international, virtual community, voting and discussing what to
spend money on in an organized fashion in order to achieve their
goals.
My
dream is...
that
the system could expand to become so large and mature, that the best
ideas for peace leap out of it like popcorn
that
petitions, striking, demonstrating, rioting and civil war become
obsolete
that
other, better systems emerge as a result
that
eventually the entire world is part of a single system that works
for everyone
Thank
you for considering my “Innovative solution for world peace.”
I'd
be glad to hear any thoughts you have on my idea.
Regards,
Stephen
Oberauer
More
about me
2D
& 3D video maker, with a YouTube
channel
with travel and activism videos, with over 300,000 views.
-
-
Related
links
Images:
Support
If you like this idea and would like to see it become reality, all I would like you to do for now is to join one or more of the Democratic Intelligence groups:
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/democraticintelligence
Google+:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/118433697403372101600
LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/Xparent-8209220
Update: http://democraticintelligence.org has been live for a while now, and needs your support. The best way to make a difference is to use the site regularly. Please register on the site and participate in order to get the ball rolling.
Here's how you can participate.
Questions & Answers
This is where I'll put questions that I've been asked about the idea, and my answers:
1. "...would just need everyone to have computers in their home?"
Based on the exponential rate of internet growth, that's probably not going to take as long as most people think. Nevertheless, if I were to imagine the system growing in stages, I would imagine that the first stage would be for the system to be accessible to whoever has access to the internet via whatever device, e.g. computer, smart phone, tablet, games console, smart tv, etc. Others could go to their public library or school to gain access, which may be more convenient than getting to a voting station and standing in a queue for a couple of hours. Those who don't have access to such facilities, or aren't able to read would have to wait. In the next stage of the system, those using the system could vote for the needs of the underprivileged - firstly making sure that they have access to the things that they really need, e.g. food, water, shelter, education, and in the next stage they could vote for publicly accessible computers... whatever works to help achieve the goal of the system.
